PDF Planet Earth Home: The Ultimate Self-Sufficient Home for any Location in the World

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Planet Earth Home: The Ultimate Self-Sufficient Home for any Location in the World file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Planet Earth Home: The Ultimate Self-Sufficient Home for any Location in the World book. Happy reading Planet Earth Home: The Ultimate Self-Sufficient Home for any Location in the World Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Planet Earth Home: The Ultimate Self-Sufficient Home for any Location in the World at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Planet Earth Home: The Ultimate Self-Sufficient Home for any Location in the World Pocket Guide.

Support your area's Farmer's Market. If possible, grow your own fruits and vegetables using organic gardening practices. In the U. Find a wide variety of local food establishments through Eat Well. Try to eat only foods raised within about miles from home. Here are great ideas for reducing it. Responsible Food Shopping: Whenever possible, shop at farmers markets, food co-ops, local health food stores, and socially and environmentally responsible chain stores research tools: Food Scores. World Watch found that more than half of all climate emissions come form eating meat.

Please get involved in any way you can. Whenever possible, buy products containing non-GMO soy, cotton, and corn. Ask your local supermarket to carry non-GMO products and ask your friends to also make this request - have faith that your requests will get back to the growers and store headquarters.

Carl Sagan

This trend will only turn around when customer demand non-GMO products. Your pocketbook is your most effective voice. Conserve Energy Please do not wait to start conserving as much energy as you can to reduce your climate change emissions! Print the energy and water consumption chart and post in a visible spot in your home. If you live in a deregulated state in the U. Bring back the clothesline! This information can be tracked over time, allowing you to gauge the impact of actions you take to reduce your carbon footprint.

  • Zero carbon homes – forget legislation, let’s do it anyway. – Bioregional;
  • 15 Ancient House Designs That You Can Build Really Cheap (Potentially For Free).
  • More of the Same: Further poems and thoughts on the Christian faith & life in general.
  • Sunshine on the Table - 15 Easy, Healthy Vegan Recipes (Make Simple Vegan Meals Book 3).
  • Leons Lair: An Paranormal Thriller.
  • Das Wirken der Seele Ideen zu einer organischen Psychologie (German Edition).

Draught-Excluder for Chimneys: Even with a damp, a lot of heat flows up chimneys in the winter. Check out the Chimney Sheep to save on heating and reduce uncomfortable drafts. One well-respected Green-e certified company is TerraPass. In general, you will lower your summer air-conditioning bill by planting trees and bushes along the west side of your home. The easiest way is to unplug appliances that are not being used.

You can also plug your appliances into bye bye standby or smart meters so that they are powered down completely when turned off. Consider installing a well insulated skylight if more light is needed. Encourage family members to get in the habit of turning off lights when they leave a room taping small reminder notes to light switches can help.

Energy Efficient Mortgages U. Renewable Energy Certificates REC : If you don't have the ability to switch to renewable energy, consider buying an REC which let's you essentially purchase renewable energy without switching electricity suppliers. Buying energy from a utility, on the other hand, is like renting - at the end of fifteen years you don't have anything to show for it - and you are left vulnerable to the fluctuating costs of energy. One investment option is solar panels which can produce energy for 40 years or more - far longer than it takes to pay off the installation costs currently around 15 years for homeowners and only 7 years for businesses.

Wind power, where available, has a far quicker payback period. The International Dark-Sky Association works to educate individuals and communities about the use of energy-efficient, properly designed lighting that allows for good night sky viewing. The Fatal Light Awareness Program educates individuals about how urban lights harm migratory birds.

Conserve Water Freshwater degradation is a looming crisis that we must face head on with strong and effective actions. To determine your overall water footprint, use the Water Footprint Calculator. Determine a baseline to start reducing from. Chart the number of gallons of water used in the last 12 months for comparison to each month this year if water consumption is listed by CCF hundred cubic feet , one CCF equals gallons.

Make specific changes in products used and family member habits: buy water saving products where needed get your family involved by asking for specific changes in everyone's habits e. Keep the water turned on only while it is needed. For drinking water, keep a pitcher in your refrigerator so you don't have to let water run to cool. Fix Leaks Promptly! Check your water meter when no one is using water in the house.

If it's moving there's a leak. A running toilet can waste 2 gallons a minute. Check by adding food coloring to the tank without flushing. After 10 minutes, look for leaks indicated by color in the bowl. This is most likely a worn flapper valve that can easily be replaced. Visit Terry Love's consumer toilets report for a great review on available low flow toilets. Flush your toilet only every other time or when it has solid waste.

LeakAlerter notifies you if your toilet is leaking. Showers: Replace existing shower heads with the lowest flow product you can find. Shower heads with a mist setting let you reduce water flow even further.

Is this the best humanity can do?

Shower instead of taking a bath. Time your showers - try to keep them to 5 minutes. If taking a bath, limit how high you fill the tub. Aerators: Install flow restrictor aerators inside all faucets for a savings of 3 to 4 gallons per minute. Full Loads: Always run full loads of laundry and dishes. Choose the short cycle at low water levels whenever possible. Set the clothing washer at the lowest possible temperature needed and for single rinse only. Dish Washing: Use your dishwasher and don't rinse dishes beforehand for an average 20 gallon savings. If you buy a new washing machine, choose a " high efficiency " model.

Native Plants: Fill your yard with native plants. This will cut down significantly on watering requirements and, in the process, provide much needed food and shelter to local wildlife. Mulching: Mulch your gardens to reduce water evaporation around your plants this also reduces weeds and builds healthy soil. Drip Irrigation: Install a drip irrigation system to water your plants more effectively For Your Hoses: Buy a squeeze nozzle for all of your hoses. However, if you're watering plants, use a watering can to reduce water waste.

Best Time to Water: Water at night to minimize evaporation. Leftover Water: If you have house plants, whenever possible water them with leftover or unused water from drinking, cooking, and showering. Keep of water pitcher near your sink or bathtub and collect unused water running from the tap waiting for cooler or warmer water. Car Wash: Take your car to a car wash that recycles water. If you wash it yourself, use a bucket and sponge and rinse sparingly.

Water Pollution: Protect our water supply by following the steps outlined in How to Clean Up Our Water: 12 simple actions to help stem the tide of polluted runoff. Tap Water: Make the switch back to environmentally-friendly tap water instead of bottled water. Cooking Vegetables: Steam rather than boil your veggies to save a quart or more of water. Better yet, try giving vegetables a quick rinse, placing them in a covered bowl, and microwaving them for a minute or two. Drinking Water: In the U. For opportunities to do restoration work for a local organization, check out VolunteerMatch. The American Hiking Society coordinates week long volunteer vacations to help restore trails.

Plan regular gatherings for tree-planting and watering. They frequently find their way to open water even from 's of miles away and can harm or kill turtles, whales, and other marine mammals. For the price of a few cobwebs in a ceiling corner, they'll minimize unwanted bugs in your home. Green Nights Sleep: There are now dozens of great brands of eco-friendly mattresses. Or, safer yet, avoid purchasing clothes that require dry cleaning. Soap Nuts: Check out environmentally-friendly soap nuts Sapindus to replace your laundry detergent.

It can also be used as a general cleaning soap. Information: Why you should avoid PVC plastic. Head over to your local natural products store to pick up natural, cruelty-free body products. Responsible Shopping: Whenever possible, shop at co-ops, local health stores, and socially and environmentally responsible chain stores.

Locate a "green building" professional through the Green Building Council Directory. Get answers to specific questions at Green Home Guide. Keep up on new green products at Building Green. This can be a fantastic resource for used building material. Building Material Donations: in the US and Canada, Habitat for Humanity has hundreds of local donation centers Restore where unused building material can be donated. Alternatively, try returning excess materials to the store where purchased.

Personal Finances Move Your Money: If your money is currently at a large banking institution, moving your money to a credit union or community bank will help strengthen your local community. A miniature version can even be created on your patio or deck. Basic elements include fresh water i. Purchase plants that are native to your area. Audubon provides tips for minimizing collisions.

Food Garden: Jump into the food gardening craze! Get to know the specific ecosystem your home is located in e.

Think inside the box with these tricked-out shipping container homes

Leave the leaves! Keyhole Garden : How to create a garden with a raised bed, lasagna garden, composting, and recycling system all rolled into one. The design creates a garden that uses recycled materials, less water and maintenance, and can be made handicap-accessible. Get a Great Workout While Gardening Sustainably: Replacing gas and water guzzling equipment with traditional tools is a great way to work up a sweat while creating a beautiful, sustainable space around your home: Rake for the leaf blower Scythe for the weed whacker Push reel lawn mower or rent-a-herd of goats for the gas-powered lawn mower Long-handled grubbing hoe for the rototiller Stiff-bristled broom and some biodegradable powdered oxygen bleach and water for the pressure washer Climate-Friendly Gardens: Learn about becoming a climate-friendly gardener from UCS.

Rain Garden: Create a rain garden on your property to reduce runoff into storm drains. Veggies in Containers: Tips on growing great vegetables in containers. Backyard Bats: How to add bat-friendly features and plants to your garden. Free Dirt Exchange: Find free soil in your area for your landscaping project or garden through Tons of Dirt. Find out how much you need to work off with the Carbon dioxide emissions calculator. Natural Step : a science and systems-based approach to organizational planning for sustainability.

It provides a practical set of design criteria that can be used to direct social, environmental, and economic actions. Promotes four system conditions that lead to a sustainable society: nature is not subject to systematically increasing concentrations of substances extracted from the Earth's crust; nature is not subject to systematically increasing concentrations of substances produced as a byproduct of society; nature is not subject to systematically increasing degradation by physical means; people are not subject to conditions that systematically undermine their capacity to meet their needs.

Natural Capitalism : a business model that synergizes four major elements: radically increase the productivity of resource use; shift to biologically inspired production Biomimicry with closed loops, no waste, and no toxicity; shift the business model away from the making and selling of "things" to providing the service that the "thing" delivers; and reinvest in natural and human capital.

B Corporations : a new type of corporation which uses the power of business to solve social and environmental problems. Corporate Climate Leadership : U. EPA program that works with companies to develop comprehensive climate change strategies. CERES Roadmap for Sustainability : designed to provide a comprehensive platform for sustainable business strategy and for accelerating best practices and performance. Wake up people. I want to drive the car of my choice, not to have the Government tell me what to drive. Reznik and her organization are what gives the rest of us hope.

So many times politicians and celebrities ask for money when they should be asking for ideas. This project demonstrates cost and effect, where many can't. It saves lives and the environment. From: tony simonelli, lawrence, MA Date: September 15, Your view: They have recently showed how water can burn hotter then the sun and can power a car.

It would be a true testimit to how horrible human kind is if this fuel source is not made public. This is the stuff of science fiction turning science fact. Big oil will probably fight this discovery and i would not be suprised if the government does as well. They will say well it will cost jobs. I hope we embrace this new tecnology. It would be dispicable if it was not allowed all in the name of profit. If you want to verify this discovery please search on the web. From: yefim k, queens, NY Date: September 15, Your view: Im not sure about this, but if we use the wind, solar or any other source of energy, arent we still in some way depleting this planet of some kind of natural recource?

If we are going to depend on those recources for survival of our comforts, chances are that those resources will be abused to such extent that eventurally we will prevent them from doing what they were ment to do in the first place What Mother Nature creates, she creates for some specific reason, and if we stand in a way of that, we will eventually pay in a big way. How about we, as people that live on this planet, that enjoy eveything that it ever gave us But if you want a short term solution, how about this Build more gyms and tread mills, and connect them to some kind of energy harvesting technology.

That will solve not just energy problems, but also some other problems that we as people are experiencing How many people would get off their couches to save some money? Here is another solution We are a source of energy people and all living things. We use a lot of it, but we store a lot of it too. So when someone comes up with some kind of a machine or a method to extract energy from a dead body as gross as it sounds Unfortunately, we are not going to do anything about it until its too late. When we all go nocturnal because the average daytime tempurature is deg, we'll realize, "maybe this Global Warming thing is real".

From: Adrian Matlack, Rochester, NY Date: September 14, Your view: A magic solution is unlikely, so there will be inevitable economic costs involved in switching to renewable energy sources. This can either happen before or after our energy sources collapse on us.

Even though energy prices are rising I just don't think that it will be enough for the market to switch over on without help. It will take bold, decisive action by the governments of the world who recognize that a little damage to the economy now is better than a lot of damage later. Unfortunately, nobody was ever elected by hurting people's wallets. I'm not optimistic. I agree that by the year our energy source will remain the same only because the energy leaders today do not want to see change really occur.

The reason for this would mean that unless they have controll over how we power our vehicles and homes they will loose all of the income they have and their companies will go belly up. Instead of making efforts to keep the ideas suppressed they should be investing in those ideas. We would not be were we are technology wise if the imagination of those who created and invented what we have today were kept from free thinking. I think we will become stagnate on moving into the future if we continue to put down any new idea on energy and how we get around.

I would just hope that we can move into the future with new technology which will ultimately save our planet. From: nick barrett, fruitland park, FL Date: September 14, Your view: i personally believe that ethenol is going to be our future fuel end energy source. From: Janis Ayers, McAllen, TX Date: September 13, Your view: In reading about alternative energy sources along with many people's ideas of what would be an acceptable method for us to pursue in the year , I am thinking this guy has one of the best observations. Of the options touted, I read about Tesla usage his has to do with using existent pipes and mountain areas , using Earth's magnetic field by constructing coils to tap into it how big to be effective and where do you position these?

Additional fantastical thoughts were to have solar collectors in space with dangling cables delivering electricity to Earth. This seems absurd because of line loss, threat to other collectors, planes, orbiting satellites already busy up there , departing space ships and meteorological events not to mention they would likely burn like matches before dispersal on Earth. Solar radiation from the sun responsible for Aurora Borealis does indeed have a lot of energy but how do you go about collecting the power?

How would you store and distribute it? Most all of the rivers on Earth are already dammed for electricity from that water and it is insufficient for our ever escalating demands. Garbage recycling seems to be a good option, as we certainly generate a lot of it as well as gray water usage on our yards with fertilizer treatments for all commercial and private housing. Taxing existing means of energy only provides politicians with more money to either absorb or redistribute in ways that do not help us. All people need to take responsibility for their needs, raising some or all of their food, thinking of ways they can become energy independent with local resources available to them.

Many people try to shift responsibility for life changing decisions to governments, politicians or other entrepreneurs instead of thinking for themselves. This will rapidly become more critical as population spirals up. Already whales once hunted to extinction are now starving due to over fishing. Imagine if we as land dwellers had to dodge harvesters from another race of beings lessening our chances of survival by inability to compete for resources.

One person cannot effect a change but everyone in tandem looking for ways to change things without waiting for someone else to serve up all the answers will in itself bring about a more rapid change. Attach an ethanol plant to that sky scraper and you have a clean, renewable, and self sufficient energy source. Energy crisis solved. From: michael ngun, klin, Somalia Date: September 12, Your view: By , most of our natural resources will be used up. Unless new oil or gas fields have been discoered.

Renewable energy look great but at the curent pace, a lot more effort will be needed to maintain the current situation Not improve! If we all actually just painted the roofs of our homes with this material and had a battery backup, this might be a method to eliminate most of the energy we have to receive from the electric company.

The thing about this material is it absorbs the energy in the infared spectrum, which wouldn't stop being absorbed simply because the sun isn't up. We still need to wait and see how this tech develops though. Because this is exactly where we are going. The concept I liked the best is when Edward G, Robinson checked in to leave the earth and he got to see what heaven looked like. It was the earth before man ruined it, with all his greed and polution. Even when Billy Graham describes heaven it looks like the earth, and when the astronaughts, saw the earth from the moon they knew this was heaven,right here.

So lets leave it the way we found it. From: Seth Connell, Pullman, USA Date: September 10, Your view: There are many options open to us as far as where we will be able to obtain energy by the time of ; it is up to us to research and develop these resources so that they will be readily available to the public. I feel that by , with the exception of the little amount of fossil fuels left, the rest of our power is realistically going to come from solar cells and wind-mill farms. There is already a big move in the industrial sector towards expanding the use of these types of power generationg and it has proven efficient enough to continue the expansion of these technologies.

Now, if I was to throw out a very inprobable alternative to solar, wind, fuel-cell, and nuclear power it would be this:. In the past few years there has been a breakthrough in two seperate fields of science. The first is the teleportation of light from point A to point B over the distance of a half meter.

The second breakthrough is the perfect mirror developed at MIT. My idea integrates both of these innovations into a device that could potentially create an endless power source. Take the light transportation device, and coat the entire thing in the perfect mirror material. Place the transportation device inside of a large sphere, whose inside is also coverred in the perfect mirror material. Then place that sphere into a large pool of water. Once you transport the light into that sphere, it will continually bounce around creating heat, which will in turn heat up the sphere, creating steam to rise from the pool.

This is, in effect, an endless supply of steam energy. Like I said, it is a very inprobable idea. From: nicholas kosmas, houston, TX Date: September 10, Your view: We are all humans living in a somewhat uncontrollable environment and both global warming, natural disasters, and terroism will always be a threat to society.

But as far as global warming, losing fossil fuels, and a look towards the furture are concerned, the solution is fairly blatent and and quite simple. We all know we have the resources and the capacity to produce significantly more than we are currently. We need to step forward and quit making the same mistakes we have in the past. Obviously all this information is prevalent and most people know about it, but it's a matter of what we're NOT doing about it that makes the difference.

Use ocean water to convert into drinking water, use the sun and wind for energy, and the soil to grow the crops that we eat and the fuel that IS existent for our automobiles, bc we're going to need oil for other things. Like i said all this info the here and available, but do something drastic now before drastic measures are irefutable and next to impossible to recover from. From: laurent kel, paris, France Date: September 9, Your view: The future of energy and the only way, I think, to give the world sufficient ressources for the generations to come is the magnetic fusion energy.

This is the energy which the sun uses to shine since billions of years. This will most probably be achieved through magnetic confinement of burning plasmas. This reaction of fusion does not produce any waste, only helium which is a neutral gas. The helium produced escapes from the Earth's atmosphere into space because terrestrial gravity is too weak to retain it. I am impatient to see at work the first project of reactor built in the south of France. Our energy is going to come from the same burning of fossil fuels and every other idea will still remain on the fringe of acceptable use.

I say this because our current energy needs are met as part of a business model, and there is no existing or future business plan that incorporates any real accepted use of an alternative energy source. The only way things will change is if a business can find a way to create a real development plan allowing for wind, or solar, or any of the other myriad ideas.

Frankly, it would be a smart idea to have energy companies install and own solar panels on people's houses--they would perform maintenance and replace components as necessary. In return, the companies could still profit as people would still pay for this kind of service. A distributed energy network like this would also be more resistant to the fears of terrorism, and during harsh weather damage. In the end, no one has come up with a business plan to make it work, so in you'll see exactly what you see now, simply more expensive.

The solution to it is multi-faceted. First, a worldwide backup system for the generation of electricity should be on the minds of all of the world's brightest scientists and politicians, in case the world is ever struck by a solar storm of the wrong polarity. If the response to this idea is met with "it costs too much", ask them what money is going to fix or how much it will matter when the world is without power no banks, internet, or technology we so desperately depend on. Secondly, solar and hydrogen fuels should be researched and implemented more widely, as they have no or very little byproducts.

Our ignorance knows no bounds! From: darius bustani, mumbai, India Date: September 9, Your view: With the coming of fuel cells for automobiles there will be need of hydrogen in pressurized or liq. At the moment the only form of pollution free energy is nuclear though the effect of radioactive mishaps is also there. What I propose is that you have a dedicated small nuclear power reactor , like you have for a submarine or aircraft carrier, only to generate hydrogen and oxygen from water.

This reactor is to be stationed on a remote safe island , within an excavated hill, say in distant pacific ocean. Well elevated to be safe from future rise on sea level and tsunamis. Of course there should be ample source of good pure water. It should also be well protected from terrorist mischief.. This way if there is any small mishap, like it happened in japan, it will not effect the population on mainland. This reactor will run on a constant load continuously as there will not be any fluctuating external demands.

The gas is then liquefied on the island itself , using the same nuclear energy, and shipped to mainland port on special liquefied gas carrier ships. This will be like shipping of crude in refined state. This way all the cities near the pacific coast like L. A , San Fransisco, etc. This way the nuclear reactors will not be under any threat of being misused by some criminal elements as they lie unattended. There are many forces at work in our biosphere.

When an organism and it's activities expand unfettered for thousands of years, to a point where it affects the atmosphere, water and weather Either of two things will occur, sheer determination to reduce the population or mother nature doing it for us. Changing an indivdual's carbon foot print will do nothing if he or she is allowed to have five offspring. When those five offsprings do the same, you increase the carbon output exponentially. The future of responsible energy production is undenialble The technology is still in it's infancy, but if an absolutely "do or die" drive for it's developement were implemented, humans would enter a new era of living.

It could become a new golden age of unlimited energy created with seawater being the fuel and with no radioactive waste associated with the fission process. It would make more sense to go the extra step and make space elevators. Similar principle, but the top platform is orbital in a geo-synchronous orbit.

Just run any conductive material down the cables and viola. This would provide unlimited energy, and also vastly expand our ability to explore and colonize space. Tele-commuting: Change the law to state employers don't have to pay workman's compensation for any employee who works from home more than 36 hours a week. Simple solutions now: New construction should be mandated to use proven energy-efficient cost-effective technology. Office buildings and homes should have double pane glass, on-demand hot-water heaters, solar lighting, and solar energy collection.

Evaporating carburetors were designed decades ago. They are many times over more efficient than our current carburetors, and burn a much cleaner form of gasoline. Part of the reason gas is so expensive is because we are using a mixture of different types of gas that burn at different temperatures.

Hemp: A tough, multi-purpose, easy to grow renewable resource that has mass benefit to our energy and resource needs. Hemp is a much better alternative to corn for making bio-fuel, to timber for construction and paper, to cotton as a textile, to soybeans as a high-protein feed, and to corn and other plants for cooking oil. It has it all, and doesn't require fertilizer or pesticides because it is a naturally resistant weed that will grow just about anywhere that has a modicum of water.

Alternative energy power plants: Instead of spending so much energy to dig coal out of the ground and transport it to power plants, why not build power plants in spots where they can capture the energy of naturally burning coal fires? There are at least 17 major ones in the US alone, and that's a lot of energy that doesn't have to be mined and transported. Power plants in urban areas need to become methane based and run off the urban sewer and garbage systems.

Humans produce more than enough methane to generate power for our communities. Add to that the amount that comes from our landfills, and the need for fossil fuels for electricity becomes obsolete. Capacitance power-grid: Shift the paradigm for the energy grid. Instead of focusing simply on generation and transport of current, the vast amount of copper laid across the land should be being used to charge massive storage units Someone else had mentioned using mountains as capacitors - Tesla showed us how a century ago.

The current system is like the water system in New Orleans - old, unstable, and wasting almost as much as it transports. By making the grid a charged storage system that only releases energy when used, the waste is eliminated. It shouldn't be a question of generating power, but instead tapping the potential from anywhere.

The advancements in technology should provide a much smoother process. Fossil fuels have got to go, the mentality of major oil companies really needs to change for the better of the future. The destruction of the planet is a highly pressing issue that really has no room for error at this point. You can't continue to make money from fossil fuels if you have no place to call home. The time for debate is pretty much over, it's time for change in that area. If we don't find a solution soon, things are going to get bad, not just in America, but everywhere.

The thing about us, we're lazy it seems like. It seems like no one in the government wants to take the initiative. If i had publicity, I would press this point until something was done. I'm 18 and I can't take our energy problems lightly, why aren't the people that hold office more caring than a high school senior? We are a sad sad country, we need to make some improvements before mother nature takes her toll on us. Even protecting ourselfs require energy. To satify the energy requirements of the future is easy.

Take a look at the universe nature. If we can harness a sun we have a solution. That is the only we way we can stay clean and 'relatively' safe from ourselves. From: Nando Breiter, Bioggio, Switzerland Date: September 7, Your view: The best solution in my opinion is to combine highly efficient biofuel production with carbon sequestration in one process using pyrolysis technologies. Although biomass grows most efficiently in the tropics, employing such an approach decentralizes the production of liquid fuels, thereby increasing energy security.

The raw material, biomass, is available in most places on earth. And using the right approach and with a little creativity, I am fairly certain we have the ability to completely replace fossil fuels in the next 15 - 20 years, and sequester a significant amount of the excess carbon we put in the atmosphere at the same time. This question has been answered along time ago now! Tesla created infinite amounts of energy at his Colorado Springs lab.

The only reason why it was dismantled was because J. P Morgan did not find this to his best interest since no profit will be made. In short, if we are to encounter a detrimental energy shortage, we must utilize earth's negative living space. What do I mean? Simple: Implement a cohesive, long-term place for life underwater. As above, and so below - means of transportation is our least concern. Through aerodynamics, basic physics, and sheer man not horse power, transport vehicles can be designed to adapt to a nautical environment.

You may be wondering about food, shelter, communication, sun nourishment, and other physiological or geographical concerns, but these are the least of our worries. Resources available now and forever can support this vague, yet very feesable idea. The energy, gas, or transportation problem inevitable and impossible circumstance in exchange for numerous feasable prosblems with quick solutions that will adapt to although creating more the scarcity of energy.

Time on dryland will be a normal, daily activity. But we must utilize Earth's negative space if we are to adapt and evolve. There are billions of species surviving without oil, or any such natural resources we so ignorantly consume and destroy. We're a high-maintence species, we've grown too dependent on our own "need" for comfort and convenience.

Why can't the most advanced species in the planet's history survive primitively as other mammals? We're blind. The hummers, tv's, Ipods, and hot pockets are veiled our eyes with ignorance. We must thrive on self-preservation, not self-gratification. Adapt, you mammals. Only the wild, savage within us all may adapt to the ever changing, forward march of consumerism and technological "necessities".

I'm no expert, I don't have a phD in bio-genetics or physics. I'm merely an observer of things, and I think it's due time we sharpen the Ockham's Razor. Thank you for your time. If we list the pros and cons of the options, SSP comes up with good pros and few cons. There are technological hurdles but not impossible ones. The bigger hurdle - which I'm trying to jump right now: - is to get the political leadership and the public thinking about SSP. For those who quickly cite technological issues, I'll just as quickly note that sixty years ago PCs and satellites weren't on our radar screens.

Unlike energy solutions such as ethanol which doesn't have such a good pro-con analysis and is somewhat driven by parochial political interests, SSP might well meet the needs of the fast-growing global economy. From: Han Wen, San Jose, CA Date: September 6, Your view: I think the most practical technology that we have today that could meet our insatiable desire for energy in the future is nuclear. It's not sexy; it's not PC, but it does work and France serves as a great example.

A significant amount of the nuclear waste can be recycled as also demonstrated by France. From: chase hobson, ft,lauderdale, GA Date: September 6, Your view: we all share in wonderful dream for tomorrow,but if we don't want to care for the planet and find a willingness to make a change in the path we choose ,,,I truley am afraid for tomorrow..

There is no real person out there who really shares my feelings,my pain for the things that really matter to myself and affect our society as a whole. We should demand the best in our elected officials values and integrity,Yes integrity ,,,,,,,,,May I suggests that you start knocking at the door for real anwers. Start looking to Al Gore. Please take a poll.. Who's values,hopes,dreams for our planet, our existance and the chance for all of us to co-exist in harmony do you relate to? From: Craig Bowe, Freeport, Bahamas Date: September 6, Your view: The future of energy will most certainly be in renewable sources as the world becomes more independent of torrid regions with constant instability.

As the world begins to accept that living in commune with the Earth is the best long term solution to the energy problems of humanity then the current novelties like wind and solar will become more prevalent at the consumer level. All the while hydroelectric, geothermal, tidal power and plasma emergent technologies are to be utilised moreso on a larger scale. Hydrogen energy, which is the solution that is there for the autmotive industry currently is an excellent perpetual source on a larger scale and a source that produces more combustible energy per unit measurement than any fossil fuel source currently on the worldwide market.

These technology just need an opportunity to market their potential and the fascination that humanity has with processing artifacts and dead material for fuel will give way to the promise of! Ethanol serves as nothing more than a boondoggle for special interest groups in the midwestern area. People don't realize corn already is used in so many products, do we really want to stretch that resource any thinner?

The future of energy: Your views - vumavyzy.tk

I know one group that does and thats the giant farm conglomerates that stand to make millions from such a change over. One bad drought and we would have an inelastic good that cost a fortune and we'd have the double whammy of higher gas prices and higher food prices. Would we use less oil? Would we just replace one high powered interest group for another?

Unlike wind the oceans currents don't stop Seriously people are talking about super kite wind generators that pose threats to not only passing aircraft but whom ever they could possibly fall on as well However if there are large submersed generators almost identical to those found in every electric dam they would pose very little threat to public safety and would make a difficult target for anyone with bad intentions. Don't think that it would be logical to run electric wires on the sea floor for a couple hundred miles?

If each one produces 20 megawatts, then the total for stations would be 12 Gigawatts, hardly a dent in the US consumption, which is more like Terawatts, so I think a more realistic would be a half million of these units to supply the whole US. Gilbert Saenz: "I began learning about Solar installation in August A fellow student watches as I'm leaning over to set up the mounting of Solar Panels. From: Richard Adlam, Hamilton, Bermuda Date: September 5, Your view: I'd like to see a bunch of engineers sit down and make a serious attempt at harnessing the power of lightning.

Say a bunch of huge capacitors which charge up from either the build up of electrostatic electricity caused by storms, or from direct lightning strikes. The electricity would be bled off for use. Another thought thats bugged me for years is the Earth's Magnetic Field. Find the strongest part of the field and have coils passed through it creating current.

Presumably the field revolves with the Earth's rotation to some degree, so the coils would have to move in the opposite direction. The Space Shuttle once dangled a long wire 20 - 50 yards into the space around the Earth and hence into the Magnetic Field to see if it generated power Its an alternative to the power generating solar panels. If a solar flare can cause the electric power grids on Earth to overload surely there's a way of catching that energy when the flares happen?

There is no way this will ever be remotely competitive without massive government subsidies, but they just keep making promises and "projections" to ensure that the grants keep rolling in This issue is conducting the electricity. It must be, or else the 4 miles of wire will weigh down the kite-like high altitude wind generator.

So you have 5 miles of really thin aluminum braid to channel hundreds of kW's of electrical energy? We're wasting our time playing Ben Franklin here. I am definitely in favor of wind power. We really need to act and this is a step toward a cleaner future. I do think that the US should work more diligently to build wind farms and solar panel farms. The government should be willing to put panels on the roof of every suitable home and provide the homer with a discount on their electricity. Not everyone has the money tneeded to buy the solar panels. From: Dave Leonard, London, ON, Canada Date: September 5, Your view: Interesting idea, though what kind of research data has been collected taking into account the shift in wind patterns caused by such arrays?

From: Steven Ahrens, Fairmont, WV Date: September 5, Your view: I have a design for a mountain top power generator that captures lightning and uses the mountain to store the energy like a giant capacitor. I believe that lightning can be harnessed as a future power source. We should learn from Tesla. They would be a far worse obstacle to aviation than a mountain or tower because they would not be stationary.

To fly a turbine close to position when weather conditions are not favorable will consume massive amounts of power, if even it is possible at all. The idea if reeling in the turbines in bad weather is fraught with difficulties reminiscent of the Navy dirigible disasters of the 's. I would gladly take 10 to 1 odds against this idea coming to any substantial fruition. From: Billmosb Mosby, Salt Lake City, UT Date: September 5, Your view: After reading the article on airborne windmills, I have to say that when contemplating the use of natural energy sources of great potential, beware of our tendancy to redefine our energy needs as "how much you got?

In this case, one percent of the potential is said to be able to satisfy the earth's energy needs. Ok, but how about if everybody wants the same energy usage levels we enjoy? Then the demand goes up to more like 10 or 20 percent of the potential. Has anybody analyzed what taking that amount of energy out of natural winds might do to weather patterns, which is to say climate? Or to take another case, solar energy. Solar energy systems are optimized to absorb all the sunlight that falls on them, as opposed to the earth, which reflects about 30 percent of it back into space.

Meet the open-ended energy "demand" from this resource and watch direct global heating occur in the long run. Not saying don't use natural energy sources, just recognize that nature is already using them for important things and plan accordingly. It's brilliant and immediately possible. DO IT! Provided no aircraft collide with the massive structures, this could be a safe and cost effective way to supply ample energy with minimal environmental consequences.

It also says this technology can be operational in 4 years. My point Congress please start focusing our spending dollars to sources that will make the USA the first renewable energy efficient country on the planet! And lets spread this technology to growing countries so we can see their way of life improve. We need to make the world change their negative views of us and this should be one small piece to the entire puzzle.

From: Ed Freniere, Lancaster, MA Date: September 4, Your view: Most of the government regulations concerning reduction of energy consumption and carbon emissions center around vehicle emissions. The technology is very simple in concept: just like a conventional heat pump system, you have a refrigration unit that cools your house in summer, then runs "backward" in winter to heat your house. Unfortunately, a conventional heat pump must dissipate heat into hot summer air in the cooling season, and extract heat from cold winter air in the heating season - not very efficient.

However, a few feet below ground is an enormous heat sink - the earth and its groundwater. A ground source heat pump uses the earth, at a constant, year-round 50 degrees F at my lattitude in the northeast, to greatly improve the efficiency of a heat pump system. To make this technology work, you must bury the cooling coils underground. This is the drawback of this system:! This is obviously a negative incentive for home building contractors, who build on speculation at competitive cost. Imagine if all new homes were required or encouraged to install ground source heat pumps?

No, I don't own stock in any of the manufacturers of these systems, but perhaps I should. This is more than can be saved by decreasing auto fuel consumption to zero! Actually, there are little-known federal and state government programs to provide loans for energy-efficient construction and renovation. You can take this idea further and install a photovoltaic solar panel on your roof and further reduce your carbon footprint. With a large enough panel area, you can reduce it to zero. Obviously, big energy companies have little incentive to pursue or encourage this technology; for them, the money is in continuing to find new sources of traditional energy, not reduce or eliminate the need for it.

Maybe it's time for our elected officials to take a broader view of home energy consumption. Do people really think these are viable energy alternatives? Don't you think a businessman would be all over the opportunity to make money on any alternative? Even the military is desperately seeking a new energy source Solar - No power source at night. No reliable battery to store the power necessary to handle emergency power needs during disasters or power defense platforms for weeks at a time.

Buying power from other countries that still have daylight is just stupid.. The whole planet has been at war with one another since Are you honestly naive enough to think that is going to stop during your lifetime? Hydrogen - This is the dumbest part yet. Most hydrogen in the US comes from steam reforming natural gas. This process still generates CO2. The only source of hydrogen from water is electrolysis As an engineer "clean nuclear power" has to be the dumbest most frightening suggestion we hear every day. Are they serious? Talk about leaving a massive problem for future generations to handle Conservation - Energy is needed for production of goods, and people seem to think that industry is the sector that needs to conserve.

Individuals are the conservation problems. When you see people protesting against major polluters, they are barking up the wrong tree. The fact is there just ISN'T an alternative out there yet. We just aren't there and the "global warming" threat of rising oceans is very real. Flood the low lying heavily populated regions and we will see nature handle the problems we have generated.

The need for change is obvious, but if we aren't aiming for the right goals, we are just going to end up jumping from one boat to another while both are heading over a waterfall. Put a groove down the middle of major highways power it from the wind generation and tie into the national power grid and bada bing I suspect that the most significant advance in the next 13 years will be in extracting more utility from each unit of energy we presently have access to.

Solar cells will become more efficient, and so will fossil-fuel engines. Ditto for all the other energy sources. Here's a rule of human nature: The easier it is to use an energy source, the more we use it frivolously. Therefore items made in China are somehow cheaper than the same items made in our own back yard. This silliness has to stop, and surely will in the years ahead, as the labour forces in these developing countries demand wages comparable to our own. But why are we relying on international economic forces to dictate where we buy our shoes from?

There's something odd about the fact that it took years to to create an auto industry based on fossil fuels but it is going to take very much longer than years to progress to something better, even though 90 percent of all the scientists who have ever worked with cars are working with them today. D'ya get the feeling that people are just dragging their heels, waiting for a miracle cure to self-materialise so that the hard, expensive work needn't be done? I remember debates like this, about alternative fuel sources and the impending fuel crisis back in !!!

We should be 'there' by now! From: ian jensen, calgary, Canada Date: September 4, Your view: million dollars to build these is peanuts compared to how much energy plants cost. What are we waiting for? Now try to get everyone to agree,that is the problem. Watch energy company's influence the politician's. From: Anthony Chong, Curacao, NT Date: September 3, Your view: There seems to be a lot of people with different views on the environment our earth is now showing us.

There Are a lot of things to consider when thinking about going green or going anywhere. We have to be very careful what choices we make since they will take us and our earth in a certain direction. Taking care of the environment happens one person at a time, one step at the time. To think about how many jobs will cost us to just swich from one energy source to another one is a big thing already.

But there will always be new ways to give everyone a job even if it's in a line of work that helps us save our earth. There are many directions our earth can go to depending on our choices. There are ways of exploring "greener" solutions which don't have to sacrifice other people's jobs. They will just have to change jobs, do something else and still help us help our earth. Money isn't everything but in the society we've built so far it can do a lot and one of the things it can do is create opportunities to find new ways to "go greener" and it will defenetely help us take care of our earth.

We are an integral part of nature and often we speak as if nature is a separate entity. We are part of it all and cannot be excluded. So saying to "save a rainforest" or something like that doesn't mean to save a rainforest in itself As far fetched as it might seem sometimes How many times don't we read, see and hear people say how anything is possible? Everybody who has reached somewhere in life has done this by hard work and had to go through some tough times before things got better. Ofcourse there will be people saying that they didn't have that and some truly havn't.

My point? If I had just If I had just. Now we KNOW what to do, the how is in many things there, we just need some research to find out what the Best way is. So if there's anything you can and want to imagine From: matthew shaub, sinking spring, PA Date: September 3, Your view: oil will be of abundance for the next 70 years at lest we will just finally utilize it the way we should have years ago. We arre being squezed again by this false Hydrogen cell car, its a battery powered car.

Seperating Hydrogen and Oxygen from water will be the future as these highly flammable gasses can be injected directly into turbines or combustion engines. Lets be real, coal, oil and gas will still be the dominant sources for our energy in Solar, wind and wave technologies will continue to have limited applications and viability. Nuclear fission will also continue to be a major source of energy However - a shift will be in process Electrical power generation will come from nuclear fusion, rather than fission.

In , it will not be the dominant source for energy, but it will be a reality Transporation energy will already be down the road toward hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. Hydro will also be in use, but percentagewise, in decline because of limited availability and environmental issues. These technologies and solutions are real and viable, but they take time, research and of course lots of money to develop.

Taxing energy is not the answer. Keeping energy cheap and providing incentives to energy companies will drive change much more rapidly than taxation and government programs. Lets be real The developed world's appetite for energy is growing and the developing world's appetite is growing even faster China, India And thats not gonna change. The undeveloped nations appetite has not even been wetted. It takes energy to develop the world, lots of cheap abundant energy. It was cheap, abundant energy that allowed the "developed" nations of the world to become "developed".

Who are we to deny this to the developing and undeveloped nations of the world? To hold them back from the quality of life we enjoy in the west. Anyone who thinks we should spend money on burying CO2 instead of investing in building power plants in South Africa should go live in a grass hut with no electricity in South Africa By supporting the rapid growth in demand for energy of the next 50 years, we will allow the free market and energy companies to develop the next generation of technologies to provide energy.

I am not saying that we should not invest in technologies to create cleaner, more efficient energy from current sources - or develop more efficient ways to use that energy - quite the contrary, those things will happen of their own accord, by the market. The world has an insatiable appitite for energy.

It is not going to get smaller - it is going to continue to grow exponentially. Current sources alone will not support that growth. If untaxed and unchecked, that growth will drive energy companies to new sources much more rapidly - nuclear fusion and fuel cell technolgies. The oil companies will be unable to meet demands To force the developing and undeveloped nations to introduce only "clean, renewable" energy sources is criminal. Support them with energy as we have enjoyed and they will become developed, education will follow, productivity, longevity, quality of life will improve dramatically.

Contrary to all the "Chicken Littles" in the world, the sky is not falling. There is a bright future for us all. Cheap, abundant energy is the key to it all. Support cheap energy and the marketplace will drive new technologies and sources - viable, clean, abundant, cheap sources Smother it with taxes and political "targets" and try to regulate and mandate the pace of change with government intervention and it will still happen - but 50 years later Give them energy - watch them grow and live good lives From: Reinaldo Vega, Berkeley, CA Date: September 3, Your view: I find it interesting that we pick a nice round number like to set for our goal to fix our environmental problems.

Why not tomorrow? That we're willing to put it off for another 13 years is reason enough for skepticism. We underestimate how long it will actually take to fix the problem, because we don't fully understand how we as people would respond to a measure of success in this regard. What do you think will happen if people see the CO2 numbers, and the yearly global average temperature, start dropping?

Find Places to Stay in Taos on Airbnb

I suspect that our sense of environmental urgency will fade, and some fraction of us will end up reverting to less environmentally benign but less expensive or more convenient practices. This would dampen the effect of everybody else's efforts. So in that sense, I can perfectly well see people turning all this into an environmental stock market - when CO2 goes up, you conserve; when CO2 goes down, you spend. So long as the fear of punishment isn't too great, people will do what they think they can get away with. The trick is getting people to realize how little they can get away with, and the best way to do that is, in a free market system, by the power of the purse.

So, how soon we can fix I prefer the term alleviate "the environmental problem" will ultimately depend on how quickly the global market can adjust to, and embrace wholly, environmentally benign technologies, products, and services. It will also depend on how effective the education system is, and becomes, in producing a scientifically literate public.

The latter is the more fundamental, and therefore the most important, and is not helped by religious zealotry trying to wedge their way into the science classroom, the result of which being a numbing of the minds of our children. So here's a thought; rather than read The Bible on Sunday morning, try reading a science book instead, because I seriously doubt that God will forgive or fix your environmental impact, no matter how much you pray for it.

If you think greed is a "deadly" sin, how do you think God will react to you destroying The Earth? That being said, my answer to the environmental question is "who knows. We also seem to sit around and hope that other people or powers will jump in at the last minute, despite the lack of supporting evidence. I used to own a car before I moved to CA, but now I don't have one, and I'm a car nut, so it was painful at first.

Why the sacrifice?

  • Where Will We Live After Earth?.
  • Dear Little Boy of Mine?
  • Additional information;

Because I don't need one where I am, and frankly, having not owned a car for over a year, I can't think of a single car that is good enough for me. The "efficient" ones aren't efficient enough, and the pretty ones are too thirsty. I'd rather take the money I'm not spending on car insurance, car payments, and gasoline and throw it into an interest bearing account, thank you very much. Maybe I'll invest it in oil As for the technologies we'd need to solve our environmental and energy problems, one thing is for sure - we need nuclear power.

It doesn't use hydrocarbons and its power density is substantially greater than solar panels or wind turbines. I think it will make the biggest impact, if only we get smarter about using it. People have to get over their fears and misconceptions about nuclear power, because new nuclear technologies not only produce less harmful waste, but in some implementations can also re-use our current nuclear waste and make it even less radioactive.

Now take all that waste, consolidate it in a secure underground facility, and for good measure, don't build any houses nearby. Oh wait It's all there, folks! Use it! Many 'fad' solutions such as utilizing hydrogen gas to operate cars is not feasible because of the vast engineering problems associated with transporting and containing such an explosive and dangerous gas. Nuclear power is safe, promising and could easily sustain America for years, but the political and ethical discrepancies that have arisen from Three-mile Island and Chernobyl will also taint this option.

Solar cells have the ability to improve fold and reduce in price by the same amount. Too little funding has been spent on photovoltaic cells and other methoods of solar capture. Converting solar rays to electricity is innately carbon-neutral and does not pose the environmental impact that developing hydrologic power plants. We, as Americans need to ask for our government to fund this extremely promising energy source.

If you can make a lot of money in the present without a thought to the future, history has shown that the cycle repeats itself constantly. The majority of planning being done for the future is not on saving the planet or any green approach, but is on profits. There are solutions that will achieve both and profits must be addressed or it will never get off the ground.

I have spent 26 years in the Utility Industry. My job included looking at different power generation options and the success or more often the failures of different approaches and designs. The two largest success stories were a combination of Hydroelectric Generation and Nuclear Power Generation. Hydro however has reached its limit there are no more streams to dam up. Nuclear has the draw back of too much up front money, but will pay extremely high dividends over the long haul. Coal is efficient but dirty. Fuel oil is both dirty and expensive. Natural gas is clean but very expensive.

And wind and solar generation are so low in productivity that the up front and maintenance costs aren't worth the effort. Solution, restructure the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by at least providing adequate staffing to allow the licensing and construction process to procede smoothly. Disband the International Nuclear Power Organization since it has become a political burecratic organzation that unduly hampers the operations of existing sites.

Important project way up in the middle of the air? Of great importance to the country? Nearly unguarded? Hello terrorists! It will be interesting to see how they overcome that problem. Wind farms? How will they prevent collisions and entanglements between these devices? What will the effect on birds be if anyone actually cares anymore? Sounds like they will be vulnerable to sabotage; I can see someone flying a drone through a wind farm and wiping it out.

My gut feeling is the cost will be higher than the predicted 2 cents. But even if it only -matched- what we currently pay for electricity, I suppose it might still be worthwhile in terms of being environmentally cleaner, and it may lessen our dependence on fossil fuels, which is always a Good Thing. I'd like to see a much lighter tether, how about diamond fiber?

And transfer the electricity to the earth station by microwave. I do have one issue though. If there is a crash of one of these vehicles among many "flying generators" that is supplying power to the whole nation, can you imagine how catastrophic that would be? A craft getting entangled with all the cables of all the other crafts? A massive power failure across the nation. Or will they just have enormous spacing that it will be impossible for a collision, even as a runaway, out of control craft that will not tangle into other power cables.

But look who you voted in Support your troops guys.